The Industrial Legacy
In this outline, mainly due to
space considerations, many industries, which could have been
seen under different headings, are grouped together under one
heading. These include primarily those grouped under earthenware
and chemical industries.
Documented evidence
of 916 at the monastery of San Vincente of Ovideo shows a
considerable amount of Arabic expressions describing textile
products and items of clothing.[1]
These coincide exactly with the introduction of cotton
manufacture for the first time into Europe by the Muslims in
both Sicily
,
but most of all in Spain under Abd Errahman III (912-961). He,
Abd Errahman, also established extensive manufactures of silk
and leather.[2]
Scott emphasises most particularly the strength and delicacy of
texture of the products, and the extraordinary permanence of the
dyes employed in the fabrics.[3]Le
Bon is categorical that it is from Islamic Sicily that the art
of cloth dyeing spread to Europe.[4]Sicily
seems to have shared the same expertise as is often the case
with most manifestations of Islamic civilisation
. On
the island, the textile factories of Palermo, which had fame
under the Muslims carried on under the Normans, of which
remnants survive in the regalia of Roger II, preserved in the
Treasury of the Holy Roman Empire in Vienna.[5]
In the middle of the 12th century, silk industry
seems still restricted to Sicily alone, and from there it spread
to other regions in the course of the 13th century.[6]
It spread to central and northern Italy, Provence
and finally to northern
Germany.[7]Lucca
became the great centre of the silk trade but Bologna, Venice
,
Augsburg, Ulm and other cities also raised silk worm or produced
silk fabrics.[8]
Carpet
manufacturing played a major part in furthering Islamic crafts
and skills, and also in sharpening Western tastes. It was
Eleanor of Castile who brought woven carpets to England
in 1255 on her marriage
to the future Edward I.[9]
Gradually the once muddy and straw covered floors left way to
carpets as we have today. The Islamic impact stretched further
in geographical terms, to the far north, one of the oldest
extant Oriental carpets, dating from the early
15th century, was found in the village church
of Marby in northern Sweden, and there is a whole category of
Scandinavian adaptations of Oriental textiles, some of them of
Islamic derivations.[10]
From
the East, Islamic textile products introduced, not just
linguistic expressions, but also new varieties of cloth and
ideas, such as Damask (from Damascus
),
Fustian from Fustat and Muslin (from Mosul) in which the
respective types of textiles were believed to be manufactured.[11]
Further legacy in the field, that associates names and objects,
includes cotton, divan, sofa, and mattress, as well as
baldachin.[12]
In respect to
technological breakthroughs within the industry, Pacey notes
that, along with paper, the magnetic compass, and other
innovations, a new type of loom was one of the innovations which
appeared in Western Europe soon after 1150.[13]
Such textile technology was already in existence in Muslim Spain
centuries before appearing in the rest of Western Christendom
.
The early phase lasting from 825 to 925 was marked by two
interesting technological innovations, one of them being the
horizontal loom, which appeared, together with the use, well in
advance of Christian Europe, of silk thread,[14]
as in the shroud of Ona, Burgos (datable to sometime around
925.)[15]
The implications are clear: the horizontal loom was already in
use in Al-Andalus at least three centuries before the rest of
Europe, giving rise to a weaving industry there.[16]
Thanks to Pacey’s erudition, it is possible to outline the
history of impact in this area, and accept with him, that
although, in the use of non human energy, Europe in 1150 was the
equal of the Islamic and Chinese
civilisation, in terms
of the sophistication of individual machines, however, notably
for textile processing, and in terms of the broad scope of its
technology, Europe was still a backward region, which stood to
benefit much from its contacts with Islam.[17]
A few years before 1150, the first cotton cloth to be woven in
West Africa was produced, development indicating that new areas
were being drawn into technological dialogue due to events in
Spain and nearby areas of Africa.[18]
Migration of people with relevant skills was a possible
explanation for the different diffusion of many techniques.[19]
Documentation of the equipment used is non existent, but
deductions can be made from a distribution map of different
types of loom in Africa prepared by a specialist on ethnic
textile traditions.[20]
If we take only the looms used for weaving cotton, and exclude
types thought to derive from later European influence, the
distribution coincides almost exactly with the areas, which were
under Islamic influence by 1150 or soon after; and the vertical
cotton loom used in the Mali region of West Africa, and operated
only by women, was of a type also found in North Africa.[21]
It is possible that looms of this type were in use as early as
1150, and that they were introduced into Mali about then as a
result of trade with North Africa.[22]In
Europe, a new type of horizontal loom was introduced, notably in
the Low Countries for weaving woollens, and its great advantage
over earlier European looms was that some operations (such as
raising and lowering heddles) could now be controlled by foot
pedals, thus leaving the weaver’s hands free to pass the shuttle
forward and backward; the idea of pedal operation possibly
derived from Islamic weaving.[23]
However, whilst in Iran, Syria
,
and parts of East of Africa, when pedals were used, the operator
sat with his feet in a pit below a fairly low slung loom, in the
West, the whole mechanism was raised higher above the ground on
a more substantial frame, precisely like looms of this type,
which were very widely used in the Islamic part of Spain by
1177, and it was probably from here that they were first adopted
in Christian Europe.[24]
[1]
Aguade Nieto, S.,
De la sociedad arcaica a la sociedad campesina en la
Asturias medieval, Universidad de Alcala de Henares,
1988, p. 156.
[2]
J.W. Draper:
History; op cit; Vol II; p.386.
[3]
S.P. Scott: History, Vol II,; p.589.
[4]
G Le Bon:
La Civilisation; op cit; p.233
[5]
J.D. Breckenridge: The Two Sicilies; op cit; p.54
[6]
M. Erbstosser: The Crusades
;
op cit; p. 186.
[7]
Ibid.
[8]
Ibid.
[9]
John Sweetman:
The Oriental Obsession; Cambridge University Press,
1987; p.5.
[10]
R. Ettinghausen: Muslim Decorative arts; op cit; p. 14.
[11]
C. Singer: East and
West in retrospect; op cit; p. 764.
[12]
R. Ettinghausen: Muslim Decorative arts; op cit; p. 15.
[13]
A. Pacey: Technology
; op cit; p. 38.
[14]J.
Zozaya: Material Culture
in Medieval
Spain; in
V.B. Mann; T.F. Glick; J. D. Dodds: Convivencia; Jews
, Muslims, and Christians in Medieval Spain;
G. Braziller and the Jewish
Museum; New
York; 1992; pp. 157-74; p. 159.
[15]
For the horizontal loom, see: M. Returece: El templen:,
primer testimonio del telar horizontal en Europe?’
Bolletin de Arqueologia medieval; 1 (1987); pp. 71-7.
[16]J.
Zozaya: Material Culture
; op cit; p. 159.
[17]
A. Pacey: Technology; op cit; p. 44.
[18]
Ibid. p. 38.
[19]
Ibid.
[20]
H.L. Roth: Studies in Primitive Looms; 1918;
Reprinted Bedford; England
; Ruth Beam; 1077; p. 63.
[21]
A. Pacey: Technology
; op cit; pp. 39-40.
[22]
Ibid.
[23]
Ibid. p. 41.
[24]
Ibid. p. 41. |