Islamic Art: Admiration and Artistic Reproduction
Medieval Western Christian admiration for Islamic arts and
aesthetics is symbolised by the long list of Islamic art objects
found amongst Western collections. Hence amongst the earliest in
the British Museum in London is an Irish bronze gilded cross
dating from the 9thcentury with a glass paste in the
centre which has the Arabic phrase: `Bismillah’ (in the name of
God) in Kufic letters, and in the Musee de Cluny at Paris, there
is a silk fabric which came from the tomb of Bishop Bernard de
Laccare, which contains Arabic inscriptions: La Illaha Ill
Allah, Muhammad rasul Allah (There is no God but God, and
Mohammed is his messenger).[1]
The tapis Sarrasinois
(Muslim carpet) became known in Louis IX’s France, and in 1277
there were trade privileges for it in Paris.[2]
In the 14th century, woven Islamic hangings were
prized in Arras, whilst silks were a precious part of church
treasuries: a cope from Mamluk Egypt
inscribed in Arabic with
the words `the learned Sultan' was in St Mary's Church, Danzig,
early in the same century.[3]
Equally the Medici collection of Islamic objects formed the
nucleus of today's holdings of the Bargello Museum in Florence,
and infiltration of Islamic motifs and objects into Western
Europe was the result of the thriving late medieval trade with
Mamluk Egypt and of the acquisitive instincts of the great
Italian aristocratic families.[4]
In the 18th century, another craze, Kufic coins (8th-early
11th century,) highly coveted items in north-eastern
Europe in the early Middle Ages, now appeared in large numbers
in many places around the shores of the Baltic Sea, in the
Scandinavian countries, in Northern Germany, and in Russia.[5]These
finds instigated serious research and a fairly large literature,
such as George Jacob Kehr Leipzig monograph in 1724, considered
the first scholarly book on Muslim numismatics[6]
and also of Muslim archaeology in the widest sense.[7]
By the end of the century catalogues of coin collections could
be found in various parts of Europe: The Museum Cuficum
Borgianum in Rome, the Museo Naniano in Padua, the Royal Library
in Cottingen, and the Stockholm collection, which culminates in
Fraehn’s systematic classification of Muslim coins.[8]
Most of these Islamic
objects and others were no mere objects for collection, but
were, instead, best symbols of a civilisation that was once both
sophisticated and superior. The appreciation of Islamic superior
science has also been acknowledged by most, if not all, the
contemporary learned amongst Western Christians. This
civilisation, however much feared, was, thus, bound to give rise
to admiration and envy, surely, and was also to be imitated to
large measure, including in the artistic field. Lethaby insists
that it was inevitable, that with the Muslim revival of
learning, the acquaintance with Arabic numerals, trigonometry,
astrology and philosophy, that the arts would have had their
share of influence.[9]Ettinghausen
also maintains that Eastern arts were so popular in the West
because there was specifically no Muslim iconography or overt
religious symbolism, which would have been offensive to the
Christian mind.[10]
`The innocent blandness of the various quadrupeds and birds,’
and arabesques, made the objects on which they were portrayed
fully acceptable, even for the wrapping of a sacred relic or the
carpeting of the altar steps.[11]
The ready acceptance of Islamic objects and arts, obviously, was
their obvious aesthetic quality, their harmony, opulence, and
often the great richness of their colours.[12]
But more importantly, a further asset, especially in the early
periods, was the high degree of technical skill evident in the
execution, far surpassing anything possible in the West.[13]
The
admiration for Islamic arts and aesthetics was such that no
exception was ever taken to the use of the Arabic script, which
was widely used. It can be found on the halo of the Madonna,
along the edges of the garments worn by saints, on cathedral
doors, and on every other Possible surface.[14]It
was noteworthy during the reign of Henry II when a new type
ornamentation of Muslim and Arabic in character appears in the
carvings of English architecture.[15]
In the church of the Martorana built by George of Antioch for a
convent of Greek
nuns in Palermo, the
Arabic inscription runs round the base of the tiny dome, which
actually translates a Greek hymn.[16]
And although Arabic writing had a symbolic meaning in the Muslim
world, and certain formulas contain religious invocations, the
West apparently did not understand it as such.[17]
So
endearing was the Islamic artistic influence, such an influence
spilled beyond the post medieval period, thriving even at the
height of the so-called Renaissance
.
Hence, the Reception of a Venetian Embassy in Damascus
,
attributed to the school of Bellini in the early 16th century,
was by an artist who was familiar with the topography and
monuments of Damascus.[18]Turkish
costume and Muslim dress in general attracted immense interest,
in 1587 an unknown European artist producing a volume of
watercolour drawings of `Turkish, Moorish and Persian figures,’
which in turn provided the models copied by Rubens in his
Costume Book in about 1600.[19]
The Frenchmen Tavernier and Chardin were so moved by their
experiences in the East that they publicly wore, on their return
to Europe, the Eastern dress that they had acquired at first
hand, and King Louis XIV's interest also encouraged the issue of
popular engravings of Persian subjects, which included details
of costume and architecture.[20]
In England
,
under the later Stuarts, as under the Tudors, the brilliance of
Islamic textiles and the captivating intricacy of the arabesque
found a happy correspondence with existing tastes and also made
notable contributions to them.[21]Rembrandt,
too, was collecting Eastern objects, including miniatures,
costumes and metalwork, some two decades, it seems, before
copying, in the 1650s, original Mughal miniatures in his
possession in Amsterdam.[22]
Rembrandt also owned a collection of several dozen Mughal and
Deccani paintings, which he copied.[23]
Sweetman also notes how, subsequently, with the concourse of
Muslim calligraphy line-along with many other influences, Celtic
art-became part of `a highly charged decorative language,’ which
led to Art Nouveau.[24]
The
appreciation of Islamic arts in Western culture finds expression
in the many sources that sought to revive such a place even
after the Islamic impact had dimmed. Hence Ettinghausen notes an
early 19th century awakening of interest in the artistic
monuments of Islam, especially in buildings, the first country
to arouse such interest and instigate a sizeable literature
being Spain.[25]James
Cavanah Murphy pioneered this upsurge in
Arabian Antiquities of
Spain, a book which expresses enthusiasm for everything
Islamic, including buildings, their decoration and inscriptions.
Other writers also active in Spain in the first half of the 19th
century include A. de Laborde, Girault de Prangey, J. Goury, and
Owen Jones.[26]At
about the same time, other writers in their discussion of
Sicilian monuments included the Muslim remnants.[27]The
outstanding figure in this group remains Frederich Sarre
(1865-1945), who, from 1896 wrote about 200 books and articles,
which cover the Islamic impact from Spain to India, and that
includes architecture, painting, the minor arts, and also
forerunners of Muslim art and its relationship with European and
Far eastern arts and crafts.[28]Sarre
even fixed the exact historical and geographical place of whole
groups of objects and monuments.[29]Belonging
to the same era is William Richard Lethaby (1857-1931), who
became the first Principal of the Central School of Arts
and Crafts, London, who
Sweetman notes, as an Arts and Crafts man concerned to propagate
standards of example and method across the whole field of design
`sensed to the full Europe's debt to the lands of `Caliphs and
Emirs, Mahomet, Arabs
,
Turks and Saracens'.[30]
Islamic art and
aesthetics impacted so strongly, that early Islamic objects
bearing them, from objects prized for decorative purposes, soon
turned into imitated Western objects, thus providing the
foundations for some of the most successful early Western
Christian crafts and industries as the following shows.
[1]
M. A. Marzouq: Influences of the Arabian art on the
European Medieval arts: in The Islamic Review;
March 1970; pp 23-9; p.27.
[2]
John Sweetman: The Oriental Obsession; op cit; p.5.
[3]
R.A. Jairazbhoy; Oriental influences in J Sweetman: The
Oriental Obsession; p.5.
[4]
C. Hillenbrand: The Crusades
, Islamic Perspectives, op cit;.p.406.
[5]
R. Ettinghausen: Islamic Art and Archaelogy: in Near
Eastern Culture
and Society;
Ed by T. Cuyler Young: Princeton University Press, 1951:
pp 17-47; at p.21.
[6]
L.A. Mayer: The Rise and Progress of Moslem
Archaeology (in Hebrew), Jerusalem, 1935.
[7]
R. Ettinghausen: Islamic Art; op cit; p.21.
[8]
L. Mayer: The Rise; op cit, pp 6-7.
[9]
W.R. Lethaby: Medieval Architecture; op cit; p. 63-4.
[10]
R. Ettinghausen: Muslim Decorative Arts
; op cit; p. 14.
[11]
Ibid.
[12]
Ibid.
[13]
Ibid.
[14]
A. de Longperier: 'L'Emploi des caracteres arabes dans
l'ornamentation chez les peuples Chretiens de
l’'Occident,'
Revue archaelogique, ii (1845), pp. 696-706; in R.
Ettinghausen: Muslim decorative Arts
; op cit; p. 14.
[15]
W.R. Lethaby: Medieval Architecture; op cit; p. 63-4.
[16]
J. D. Breckenridge: The Two Sicilies; op cit; p. 53.
[17]
R. Ettinghausen: Muslim Decorative Arts
; op cit; p. 14.
[18]
Blair and Bloom at
http://www.islamicart.com/main/architecture/impact.html
[19]
In J. Sweetman: The Oriental Obsession: op cit; p.32
[20]
Ibid. p.48.
[21]
Ibid. p.71.
[22]
Ibid. p.32.
[23]
Blair and Bloom at:
http://www.islamicart.com/main/architecture/impact.html
[24]
J. Sweetman: The Oriental Obsession; Preface: XVI.
[25]
R. Ettinghausen: Islamic Art; op cit;
p.23.
[26]
A. de Laborde: Voyage pittoresque et historique de
l'espagne, Paris, 1806-1820;
G. de Prangey: Monuments Arabes et moresques de
Cordoue, Seville
et Grenade....
Paris, 1836-9. Idem, essai sur l'architecture des Arabes
et des Mores en Espagne, en Sicilie et en Barbarie,
Paris, 1841; J. Goury and O. Jones: Plans,
elevations, sections et details of the Alhambra
......
London, 1842-5.
[27]
R. Ettinghausen: Islamic Art; op cit; p.23.
[28]
J.H. Schmidt: Frederich Sarre, Schriften, Berlin,
1935.
[29]
In R. Ettinghausen: Islamic Art; op cit; p. 30.
[30]
W.R. Lethaby: Medieval Architecture; op cit; p. 63. in
J. Sweetman: The Oriental Obsession; op cit;
p.203. |